It’s one of those suggestions that swirls the second after England loses in a major tournament. The Premier League has a ton of foreign players, and the influx of these players is stifling the national team’s development. Shouldn’t the Premier League place a limit in foreign players in order to build up the domestic game?
Of course, for many Newcastle supporters, club versus country is not much of a debate. More than a handful of fans offered cross-channel support for Euro 2012, preferring to cheer on Yohan Cabaye and Hatem Ben Arfa instead of an England squad filled with rival players. But a cap on Premier League imports would be a double blow for even the most patriotic Geordie. It would almost certainly harm Newcastle United, while doing nothing to improve the national team's prospects.
The trickiest issue with a cap could be completely outside the league’s control: it may violate EU laws about freedom of movement. The Spanish league system, for example, only limits non-EU players. (And actually, non-European players with European ancestry are not subject to the cap. Fabricio Coloccini was European as far as La Liga was concerned.)
But if the Premier League could wave a magic wand and change European law, it still would not help the national team. There are much deeper systemic issues in the youth system at work, which actually are much the same here in the United States.
In both countries, physical qualities have been valued over technical ability among youth players. That leads to a national team full of big, strong, and/or fast guys without the tactical awareness or skill to make the most of those natural gifts. (In lieu of being big, strong, or fast, a willingness to dive in for tackles is also an acceptable substitute for being able to play the sport properly.) When the World Cup or Euros roll around, is it any surprise that such a team looks bewildered when it has to break its opponents down in the attack?
You see it carry over in the English press as well. A tenacious but limited player like Scott Parker receives gushing praise, but technical passers such as Leon Britton and (dare I say) Danny Guthrie go unnoticed, and have no hope of wearing England white. It has mostly fallen to imported players to bring different qualities to the league. Just looking at Newcastle players, where in England would the club have found Ben Arfa, Cabaye, or Papiss Cissé?
A cap on foreign players would also directly hurt Newcastle, and every other club that has a limited budget. The club’s success has been built on bringing in relatively undervalued continental players. You can import Cisse for £9 million, or buy Andy Carroll for four times as much. Bring in Ben Arfa for £5 million, with Champions League and Ligue 1 title experience under his belt, or 18-year-old Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain for twice that. The cap would make English players an even greater commodity, with only the league’s heavyweights able to buy the best domestic talent.
If England hopes to regain its status as an international force, the only solution is to coach better players, not rely on league gimmicks to ban foreigners. Such a move just dilutes the quality of the Premier League and prevents less-wealthy clubs from creating sensible transfer policies. As fans of a club that seems to have a solid plan in place, it would be a shame to see that scrapped because of the Three Lions’ failures.
This is the first part of a summer series exploring commonly proposed changes to the Premier League.